"For if this FIRST had been
faultless,
there would have been no place for this SECOND."
Hebrews 8:7
No "TANACH", no "Old" Testament, no "Old
Covenant." Scripture calls it THE
FIRST.
The First WHAT ?
The Scriptural context leaves no doubt that
COVENANT is the topic under discussion.
Furthermore, the topic has 2 items which are being compared: the FIRST item as compared to the SECOND.
The FIRST is dead, dying, and brings death; the SECOND
is alive, living, and brings LIFE !
Scripture does this in another place, also:
the FIRST ADAM as compared to the SECOND ADAM+ :
Y'SHU+ the MESHIKHA (
Aramaic),
YESHUA+ HA MOSHIACH (Hebrew),
or JESUS CHRIST (English).
See I
Corinthians 15:45-47
In both comparisons, the FIRST --- while very
good and both created and established by GOD HIMSELF --- gave place to the
SECOND item as to a SUPERIOR.
The FIRST is dead, dying, and brings death; the SECOND
is alive, living, and brings LIFE !
Now, to look at Scripture itself, starting in
the book written DIRECTLY to and for the original Hebrew Roots Christians:
Hebrews 8:13
: In that HE saith, "A new," HE hath made the FIRST old. Now that which
decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away. (KJV)
The New English Bible states this truth in
this way:
By
speaking of a NEW Covenant, HE has
pronounced
the FIRST ONE "old" ;
and
anything that is growing old and ageing
will
shortly disappear.
Now enters the translation of Mr. Andrew
Roth's Aramaic-English New Testament:
"
In that HE said a RE-NEWED (Covenant ),
HE
made the FIRST old;
and
that which is old and decaying ,
is
near to disappearing. "
Mr. Roth follows this verse with a lengthy commentary,
footnote 45, explaining why Hebrews 8:13
and its contextual verses are NOT meaning "COVENANT" at all ... but
rather the "sinful predisposition" of mankind !
Thus,
herein lies a great and grievous difficulty
when
dealing with the Hebrew Roots leaders and teachers and translators:
they change the word meanings .
NEW means "new," not something old
re-furbished. New means "new"
in the Greek and Latin and Aramaic / Syriac text. Mr. Roth arbitrarily changes the meaning in
his AENT... except when it comes to "NEW WINE !"
[ A NOTE... on translating from the Aramaic /Syriac to English:
In the Semitic languages, a word may change
its meaning slightly when used in a different FORM.
Mr. Roth does not follow the rules for
translating these forms and thus, adds confusion in his AENT translation .
In
the Peshitta, ( which Mr. Roth is translating ) there are ONLY 6 VERSES in which “renewed” or “renovated” is
used.
In five of those six verses, the Aramaic/Syriac
word is a VERB in the ETHPAEL form. One time, the VERB is used in the Pael
form, according to the analytical lexicon of Dukhrana.com.
Now this is IMPORTANT: if the VERB FORM is in the simplest format (
not Ethpael nor pael ), then it means “to be NEW”.
However, if the verb form is in the ETHPAEL
or PAEL format, then it means “renew.”
The ADJECTIVE form of NEW ( CHaDaTa) --- as in Hebrews 8:8, 8:13,
9:15, and 12:24 --- always means “NEW.”
The simple adjective form always
means “new.”
Mr. Roth changes the simple adjective
"new" to his un-authorized ( by any linguistic rule )
"renewed" when translating Jeremiah 31:31 as quoted in Hebrews 8:8. ]
In BOTH the Jeremiah 31 verses and
the Hebrews 8 verses, the CONTEXT plainly states that the FIRST COVENANT
was:
·
faulty
·
old
·
decayed
·
disappearing
In Hebrews 7, the FIRST COVENANT is described as :
·
powerless (vs 18 )
·
useless ( vs 18 )
·
made nothing perfect ( vs 19 )
- inferior to the SUPERIOR Covenant through Y'SHU+ (vs 22)
In Hebrews 10, the AENT, states:
"For in TORAH there was a shadow of the
good things to come; not the substance of the things themselves... " in regards to the Blood sacrifices
establishing the FIRST COVENANT.
Hebrews 10:9 states, in reference to Y'SHU+ the
MESHIKHA:
" ...
Behold, I+ come to do Your Will, O ALAHA (GOD); HE+ abolished the FORMER that
HE+ might establish the latter. "
The former, of course, is the FIRST
COVENANT and its system of sacrifices, laws, and ordinances. They were good and given to protect all who
would take refuge in GOD.
But when the SUPERIOR COVENANT was given by
GOD through His SON+, Y'SHU+ the MESHIKHA ( JESUS CHRIST ), the old has passed
away . The former sacrificial system is
no longer valid in the eyes of GOD, ALAHA, The ELOHIM.
HEARKEN:
For
the priesthood being changed,
there
is made of necessity
a
change also OF THE LAW.
Hebrews
7:12
The Righteousness which was found in keeping
TORAH is gone now.
"... I do count them dung,
that I may
win CHRIST (MESHIKHA+) .
And be found in HIM+,
not having mine own
righteousness,
which is of the Law,
but that which is through
the faith of
CHRIST,
the righteousness which is of GOD
by faith."
~ The Apostle Paul, Philippians 3:1-14
Yea rather, we ESTABLISH the Law
... the Law
of CHRIST.
The FIRST is dead, dying, and brings death; the SECOND is alive, living, and brings LIFE !
No comments:
Post a Comment