A Re-post from October 2017 - - -
For whatever reason, Mr. Rood REFUTES Scripture in Matthew 28: 18-20 with NO SUPPORT whatsoever from the Greek and Aramaic manuscripts.
Hebrew Roots popular leader,
Michael Rood, has re-written Scriptures. Mr. Rood calls it the
"Corrected" KJV, called the Chronological
Gospels , and has re-written verses that hinder his theories. . .
verses which contain TRUTH.
Just like the Gnostics of old,
Mr. Rood bases his "corrected" version on his own logic, his own
method of counting the feast days, and the SHEM TOV . His version attacks both
Passover and Baptism. This is part two; Passover was covered in the previous post.
Mr. Rood Refutes The LORD and
Matthew about BAPTISM
For whatever reason, Mr. Rood
REFUTES Scripture in Matthew 28: 18-20 with NO SUPPORT whatsoever from the Greek and Aramaic manuscripts.
The PROBLEM is that Mr. Rood
prints his errors in the text of the Chronological Gospels as the
Gospel Truth !
This error in his version . . .
is in Matthew 28: 18 - 20, starting on page 273 and carrying over to 274, top.
is in Matthew 28: 18 - 20, starting on page 273 and carrying over to 274, top.
28:18 KJV
And JESUS came and spake unto them, saying,
All power is given unto ME+
in Heaven and in earth.
Here is
Mr. Rood's version :
Then Yeshua came and spoke to his disciples.
All power and authority has been given to me
in Heaven and in Earth.
So far,
so good. No problem in verse 18.
28:19 KJV
Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,
baptizing them in the name
of the FATHER, and of the SON+,
and of the HOLY SPIRIT:
Here is what it says in Mr. Rood's version of verse
19 :
Go !
Instead of Scripture for verse
19 , we have a long footnote, page 274
28:20 KJV
Teaching them to observe all things
whatsoever I+ have commanded you:
and, lo, I+ am with you alway,
even unto the end of the world.
Amen.
Here is
Mr. Rood's version :
Teach all nations to carry out all the things
that I have commanded you --- forever."
according to Mattityahu [[ Amen ]]
Mr. Rood deftly omitted and, lo, I+ am with
you alway, even unto the end of the world and added forever
.
What is Mr. Rood's
authority to remove and add things to the Holy Scriptures ... Scriptures that
have the attestation of over 5,000 manuscripts, many Papyri, and around 1,000
ancient lectionaries ... plus "first" versions of the New Testament
translated into a variety of old languages?
Matthew
itself is attested unto by 15 Papyri, eight of which were composed before the I I I / I V
century, according to
Nestle-Aland’s 26th edition, introduction page 49.
Here is Mr. Rood's version of
Matthew, directly copied from the Shem Tov of Matthew 28:19 - 20. The
underlined words from the Shem Tov are exactly the same in Mr. Rood’s
well-forged Chronological Gospels.
18 Jesus drew near
to them and said to them:
To me has been
given all power in heaven and earth.
19 Go
20 and (teach)
them to carry out all the things
which I have
commanded you forever.
What Shem Tov writes, Mr. Rood
writes. What Shem Tov omits, Mr. Rood omits. And herein does the problem
lie.
Mr. Rood did not translate
Matthew 28: 19 and 20 from ANY text, Greek, Aramaic, or otherwise.
He simply OMITTED the real text found in both
Greek and Aramaic manuscripts, beginning with the earliest manuscripts we have,
in the 4th century( not counting the Papyri, which were earlier ).
Then, he inserted these two
verses from the Shem Tov translation of Mr. George Howard, the Shem Tov version
which Mr. Rood uses. There are two or three different versions of the Shem Tov
/ Tob, all of which come from the Middle Ages.
The footnote to explain these
maneuvers in his version is long. Here is the part of it which relates to
his "corrections" to the KJV, page 274, top, Matthew 28:19:1 .
"The KJV and late Greek manuscripts add the phrase " Baptizing
them in the name of the Father, and of the Son , and of the Holy
Spirit." from Chronological Gospels, page
274.
That statement is BLATANTLY false.
NOTHING was “added” to the
manuscripts, neither Greek --- neither the Byzantine nor the Alexandrian nor
the Egyptian nor the Cesaerean manuscripts --- nor the Aramaic.
If Mr. Rood would have CHECKED
ANY APPARATUS in ANY version, this is what he would have found:
- NUN … ( “now”) found in the Codex D and Old Latin mss, and
- BAPTIZING … written as the aorist particle instead of present participle verb form in Codex D and also Codex B.
THOSE ARE THE ONLY TWO VARIANTS
IN ANY OF our wide variety of thousands of GREEK MANUSCRIPTS in verse 19 !
Neither of these variants tell
us that the verse was “ADDED” or inserted at a later date into the Sacred
Texts.
The EARLY Greek manuscripts (
centuries before Mr. Rood’s Shem Tov was
written ) include all three verses, nearly intact.
Verse 18 has three variants and
all three are attested to by different manuscripts. They are:
- in Heavens ( plural of Heaven);
- "the" omitted before earth,
- and the phrase found only in the Peshitta:
Even as My+ Father has sent ME+, I+ also send you.
The variants are listed in the Greek
text, the Nestle-Aland 26th edition, and as is apparent, these variants are not
major.
The phrase in the Peshitta,
which is duplicated in John 20:21, is ONLY found in the Peshitta, a Syriac
version.
All then, can see clearly that:
NEARLY ALL of the manuscripts
--- both Early and Late --- have verse
19 intact.
Thus, baptism in the name of the Father, Son, and
Holy Spirit were indeed the very words of
the Resurrected LORD JESUS to
His+ Disciples.
Verse 20 turns out the same
way. Only two variants are listed among
the hundreds of manuscripts.
- One variant cites three words in an inverted order.
- Another variant lists the omission or inclusion of "amen" at the end of the verse !
None of these variants are of much importance
to the message.
All this is to affirm that
verses 18, 19, and 20 are INCLUDED in every manuscript ever written by the
Early Church scribes , with very little variants among hundreds of manuscripts
for these three verses.
Mr. Rood's footnote now lauds
Eusebius, whom he denigrated in the introduction so forcefully. He says
Eusebius quoted the words of the "Ancient Hebrew Matthew" ( Shem Tov ) at the end of Matthew 18 times !
( versus the authentic Scriptures.)
There is no way to check
Eusebius’ writings quickly, but Mr. Rood has not shown himself to be very
accurate so far.
Now we come to the last part of
this wretched footnote: Mr. Rood explains that "there is no record" of any
historical group baptizing this way and it appears to be a "post-Constantinian invention."
HERE ARE THE FACTS:
Fact: Constantine
lived from 280 (?) to 337 AD.
Fact: from the Didache, 80 to 140
AD. The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles, Chapter 7,
page 13, Tyler, TX. Scroll Publishing
House, @ 1976 . Translated by Tim Sauder.
"Concerning baptism, baptize in this manner:
Having first said all these things,
baptize into the name of the Father,
the Son ,
and the Holy Spirit --- in living water. ... "
Fact: from Justin Martyr, 160 AD. The
First Apology of Justin. Chapter
61, page 183 ANF vol 1.
"They are brought by us
where there is water,
and are regenerated in the same manner
in which we were regenerated ourselves.
They there receive the washing with water
in the name of God ( the Father and Lord of the universe)
of our Savior Jesus Christ, and of the Holy Spirit. ... "
Fact: from Tertullian, 213 AD,
Against Praxeas, chapter 26, page 623, ANF vol 3.
“He commands them to baptize
into the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit
--- not into a unipersonal God.
And, indeed, it is not once only --- but three times ---
that we are immersed into the three Persons,
at the mention of each individual name.”
All of these Early Christian
apologists wrote these instructions about how the Early Christians baptized
into Y'SHU+ the M'SHIKHA+ (CHRIST JESUS) long before Constantine was even born ! They
wrote about HOW the Early Christians baptized in the name of The FATHER, The
SON+, and The HOLY SPIRIT.
So clearly, Mr. Rood is in
error here. His vague yet adamant statements do not line up with history nor
with Scriptures
…. nor with Truth, sadly enough.
We remember the words of the
Apostle Peter, in his second Epistle:
But there were false
prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among
you, who
privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the LORD that bought
them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.
And many
shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be
evil spoken of.
And through covetousness shall they with feigned words
make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and
their damnation slumbereth not.
For if GOD spared not
the angels that sinned,
but cast them down to TARTARUS,
and delivered them into chains of darkness,
to be reserved unto judgment … 2 Peter
2 : 1 – 4
… Spots they are and blemishes,
sporting themselves with their
own deceivings
while they feast with you… verse 13b
+ + +
COME OUT OF HER, MY PEOPLE,
AND TOUCH NOT THE UNCLEAN THING.
11 comments:
Great commentary which I am aligned with. I greatly appreciate the clarity & depth & simplicity of MATTHEW. Ironically, I found your blog while searching for clarification on a different ROOD contradiction that occurred just before the Baptism Excusion commentary in the TV show. He definitively stated the “tale” of 3 Wise Men following the Star to Bethlehem to bring gifts to the newborn Jesus was nowhere in the bible (despite referencing MATTHEW quite often). Further, he tried to conflate this “tale” with Pagan rituals tied to Easter, Halloween, Dec 25th, etc...
MATTHEW tells this “inconvenient” truth, and I can only assume the intent behind ROOD’s omission is to hide the horrors of King Herod’s attempt to use the 3 Magi to locate the baby Jesus so he could be killed (as advised by the Pharisees). When the 3 Magi betrayed King Herod, he proceeded to murder countless innocent babies under the age of 2 years.
And for a split second, I questioned myself by considering that perhaps ROOD is citing a different Bible version than the textualist versions that I’m familiar with (ASV, ESV, KJV, NASB). This turned out to be more true than I thought, but it’s unfortunate that it’s a self-revised translation with pure omissions. Later in the show, I heard the giveaway when he stated something to the effect of “these things did not occur in MY BIBLE” which I now know to be his “Chronological Gospels.”
It’s a shame really, because I thoroughly enjoyed ROOD’s commentary on the REVELATIONS. But then again, I have not read this one as carefully as MATTHEW so perhaps I’ll find a similar outcome with respect to his “inconsistencies.”
Thank you, ma’am, for your blog.
J.O.H.
Dear J.O.H,
Thank you for your kind comment.
Michael Rood's volume, THE CHRONOLOGICAL GOSPELS, does indeed include the wise men of the East, the MAGI, in Matthew 2:1-18, on pages 55, 56, 57, 58.
He includes the gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh in his Gospel account, as does the SHEM TOV manuscript, which Mr. Rood follows.
From his FOOTNOTES on those pages --- which are many --- it seems Mr. Rood REJECTS not the event but rather the NUMBER of wise men popularly made famous as THREE WISE MEN by Christian tradition.
Scripture is SILENT as to the number of WISE MEN from the East, nor does the WORD of GOD reveal to us how LARGE was the caravan in which they traveled to Jerusalem.
Scripture only tells us that "when Herod heard these things, he was troubled and ALL JERUSALEM WITH HIM." Matthew 2:3. The SHEM TOV only states that Herod was "dismayed" and ALL THE INHABITANTS WITH HIM.
Mr. Rood's footnotes are interesting in this section, but much is by conjecture; he omits telling the reader his sources for his statements, conclusions, and opinions.
On page 59, Mr. Rood does cite two sources ( the Protoevangelion of James and Josephus ) which information may ( or may not ) be taken as "Gospel truth."
The DANGER of listening to Mr. Rood lies in the fact that he INSERTS sometimes into Scripture, sometimes in his footnotes, EXTRA MATERIAL from outside of Scripture or from inside his own way of thinking.
See: John 3, pages 80-81, for insertions INTO THE BIBLE VERSES his own words and understandings.
Or, check out Acts 1:26, page 279, where Mr. Rood INSERTS into Scripture the VOTING BALLOTS in naturally-minding choosing Matthias to replace Judas Iscariot as one of the 12 . His footnote is nearly blasphemous.
AGAIN, NO REFERENCES OR SOURCES FOR HIS FOOTNOTE NOR INSERTION OF TEXT INTO SCRIPTURE.
Or, like in John 6:4, page 135, he simply OMITS that verse, based on his own reckoning, with no manuscript evidence to support the omission. He cites two manuscripts, but one of those he cites DOES NOT CONTAIN MANY CHAPTERS IN JOHN AT ALL !
Manuscript 850 of John only includes John 7:25 through 10:18 , due to the destruction of it through the centuries. [ So do we throw away John 3:16 because a single Greek manuscript does not happen to include the third chapter of John intact ? ]
Thankfully, there ARE on-line resources available to check manuscripts.
Because he frequently omits his references and sources for his statements, there is no way to check his accuracy for many of his statements; one is obliged to see Mr. Rood as the "authority" on the subject.
In this age of false Christs and false prophets, it is CRUCIAL to check, to verify, every statement which does not agree with the Anointed WORD+ of GOD.
I am afraid this world is FULL of such men, leading astray, if possible, the very elect. Yes . . . it is possible.
WISE men STILL follow The LORD JESUS CHRIST . . . not those who contort the Holy WORD+ of GOD.
May The LORD bless you for seeking His+ Truth.
Be AWARE; the wolves are running rampant across the face of this earth, dressed in sheep's clothing.
Yours for TRUTH in the inner man --- and His+ Name is JESUS CHRIST the LORD.
Sincerely,
Sr. Judith Hannah + + +
Dear Mr. Randall McCollum,
It seems we need to re-start this discussion .
I think you have forgotten the rules: that the ISSUES need to be addressed, and not the person with whom you disagree.
You are invited to present quotes and page numbers and manuscripts and facts to verify your points of disagreement.
You are more than welcome to point out my errors of FACT by showing me your facts and WHERE you found them.
I include references so that others may check my statements; I exhort you to do the same.
So, if you are really interested --- as it seems that you are --- and have some SOLID research to share, let us start again, shall we ?
Go meticulously through my article and pinpoint my errors and then look up the facts of the matter.
Then, share them and we can have a profitable, edifying discussion without rancor and harsh words.
Thanking you kindly for your interest.
In JESUS Who+ is the Way, the Truth, and the Life;
Sister Judith Hannah + + +
Dear Mr. McCollum,
FACTS, dear friend, FACTS .
FACTS separate truth from error.
Let us hear some solid FACTS from you ! We cannot read your statements and assume we know to which FACTS you are referring.
FACTS speak louder than opinions, if you wish to correct my errors or anyone else's.
Sincerely,
Yours for Truth ,
Sincerely,
Sr. Judith Hannah + + +
Dear Hannah,
I want to start my comment by saying thanks for your publications and apologize for my miseducation and poor communication. I’m from French speaking country.
However I’m found very obligated to respond to you regarding this matter.
1. Your reaction to critics ain’t for the claimed Christian. A believer who truly born of the Spirit of Yeshua, has freedom that comes from the Lord ie you can’t object criticism rather welcome it, discern it and find what’s good in there that can be taken to build one’s self ….
The Bible advised it too not to add faith to anything but to discern spirits. Also the beatitudes (Matth 5) state that for the one criticizing (cursing literally), reply by a blessing. Besides happy are you when mankind will insult you cause of my name!
Thus others people remarks on you, should be also read and commented on and discerned too…. And not deleted as done !
Otherwise in my humble opinion, this blog has no reason to be public, perhaps limited solely to people of your religious inclination.
2. By religious inclinations i meant scientific proven evangelical FACTS.
beloved sister, there ain’t no such thing as Facts for YHWH, Elohecha. HE’s all above reasonings, HE is Eternal, the infinite G-d. There’s no way to apprehend HIM in FACTS. Such is only Human foolishness and pursuit of air.
Please allow me to make it plain to you :
- G-d can not be found in facts. Science or reasonings is of the devil ( the adversary of G-d), he uses to mislead or seduce bnei Elohim.
For instance : what are the facts or science(intellectual ) thing proving that THE ETERNAL G-D, The ONLY Blessed Savior, Elohim made Himself HUMAN BEING in flesh and blood ? Or would you dare to fact that THE SERPENT WAS STANDING UPRIGHT POSITION WALKING AND CLOSEST ANIMAL ( blood cells ) TO HUMAN BEING ?
Hence Beloved sister, God can not be learned nor studied scientifically in seminars, bible schools or theological things. HE ONLY MADE HIMSELF KNOWN BY REVELATION
. Only through REVELATION. As the whole BIBLE was written through Revelation and only through it not some human intelligence whatsoever.
Satan has seduced the whole world through this science proven evangelism. He uses reasonings (facts and whatever intellectual understanding) to poison the WORD OF G-D as he did it with Eve in the garden of Eden.
So beloved, G-D is ONLY known by FAITH ( not facts ) THROUGH REVELATION. And that’s not from the will of mankind.
That’s the reason the whole world missed it because of theology which is of the devil ( I will prove it to you latter). The Pharisees ( theological teachers ) missed it too at their time. So blind in their theological interpretation of the scriptures that they couldn’t see their G-d they have been awaited for so long.
3. Coming into the matter now. I’ve tried in my poor English to lay a ground on what will make you understand now my point.
AS REVEALED by ELOHIM HIMSELF, THE BIBLE, THE HOLY SCRIPTURES, IS THE ABSOLUTE . The only absolute and the final reference for whoever claiming to be of G-d.
The believer absolute can’t be theology, no way beloved. Can not be a certain writings of certains philosophers of certain century, no way, Heavens forbid !
THE BIBLE IS THE ABSOLUTE FOR A TRUE BELIEVER!
As such, I’m not taking side for either Michael or you concerning this very matter of BAPTISM. In fact, only after reading your commentaries on Michael’s Bible version that when I’ve discovered him !
THEN, here’s my question to you beloved : if you believe the Bible to be G-D PURE WORD ( unless you don’t Which means you won’t neither be even a Christian, leave alone born of G-d ) ,
WHERE IN THE HOLY BIBLE, A SCRIPTURE’s PASSAGE, DID THE CHURCH (ABRAHAM THE BELIEVER AND HIS DESCENDANT), ABRAHAM TRUE SONS EVER BAPTIZE A SINGLE PERSONE IN THOSE TITLES OF THE FATHER, THE SON AND THE HOLY GHOST ?
Just ONLY ONE SCRIPTURE WHERE A SINGLE PERSON IN THE WHOLE BIBLE EVER BEEN BAPTIZE LIKE THAT ! In those titles …..
IF YOU CAN ANSWER ME WITH BIBLE AS FACT AND NOT THEOLOGICAL SPIRIT, beloved sister Channah, the Kingdom of Christ is closer to you.
I am Brother Boaz Yende,
a believer and servant of Adonoi Yeshua Ha Mashiyach. ( Whom the world misled still by the devil, refers as Jesus Christ ).
I’m based in the Democratic Republic of the Congo ( Kinshasa )
WhatsApp : +243 81 93 73 960
Dear Brother Boaz Yende,
Thank you for your comment. It is true that English is a very hard language to learn. If your birth-language is not from Europe, English is a very, very difficult language to master.
I am glad that you wrote to me . I could see that the struggle to write your thoughts in English was great. GOOD JOB ! I could understand most of your sentences very well.
I have one question to ask you: Do you count the NEW TESTAMENT ( NEW COVENANT) as HOLY SCRIPTURE ?
Before we start a discussion, please tell me if you BELIEVE the NEW COVENANT to be HOLY SCRIPTURE ?
Thank you kindly for writing to me.
Blessings to you,
in YESHUA+ HA MOSHIACH
[ English: JESUS the CHRIST ]
Sister Judith Hannah + + +
Dear Sister Hannah,
Shalom Aleichem,
Thank you for your prompt reply and for bearing with my poor English.
Please also accept my apologies for my late reply.
I know beloved sister that is for the love of Yeshua that you wrote to me and
that you too love me enough to correct me if i am proved to be wrong….
Every child of God must be reproved and stand correction otherwise he can be rejected forever by Elohim himself
if he dares to refute any single word of The Bible.
The HOLY BIBLE, dear sister Hannah , includes The TANAKH ( Old Testament) and the NEW TESTAMENT,
comprising in all 66 Holy Books as prophet Yeshayahu book too foretold it.
And here's what I believe. I BELIEVE EVERY WORD OF THE BIBLE IS ABSOLUTELY, INFALLIBLE , THE TRUTH. That's the way ...
I think a true believer ( unless one be like the father of lies, Satan himself) can't say, "This is not inspired, and that's not inspired."
I believe it's all inspired of God. And I'm willing tonight to hang my soul on any phase of it, and say,” IT’S THE TRUTH”.
I believe THE WHOLE BOOK.
I appreciate your time and hope to hear from you very soon.
Please do not hesitate to contact me on my WHATSAPP: + 243 81 937 3960, or
my email : lionelboaz@gmail.com
to further this topic and find the very truth of it that sets mankind free….
Acting On Behalf of Adonoi Yeshua,
Bro. Yende Boaz
The Early Church of The Lord Yeshua HaMashiyach ( Jesus- Christ)
B.P. 4278 Kinshasa. 197, Avenue Kabinda. Commune de Lingwala (Quartier Beaux vents). Kinshasa - République Démocratique du Congo.
Post a Comment