MICAH 5:2 Complete Jewish Bible

Micah 5:1... Complete Jewish Bible (CJB)

But you, Beit-Lechem near Efrat,so small among the clans of Y’hudah,out of you will come forth to me the future ruler of Isra’el,whose origins are far in the past, back in ancient times.

Neither is there SALVATION in any other; for there is NO OTHER NAME+ under Heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.
Acts 4:12

That at the NAME of YESHUA+ every knee shall bow, of beings in Heaven, beings in earth, and beings under the earth; and that every tongue should proclaim that YESHUA+ MASHIYACH+ is LORD, to the Glory of ALAHA, His+ FATHER.
Philippians 2:10-11

ARCHIVES AND OLDER POSTS MOVED TO THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE.




Wednesday, December 31, 2014

Syrian IRENAEUS Describes the 5 POINTS of HIS+ CROSS...

In detail, IRENAEUS  describes 
the 5 points 
of the CROSS 
Y'SHU+ the M'SHIKHA 

               Photo courtesy of  Mustard Seed International
     The Brazen Serpent Monument 
over-looking Mt. Nebo, Jordan



+  +  +
IRENAEUS, ( c. 120 - 202 ), Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 1,  Irenaeus Against Heresies , Book 2, Chapter 24, Section 4.  ~  In dealing with heretics, "The Folly of Arguments Derived by the Heretics from Numbers, etc." 

4. But that this point is true, that that number which is called five, which agrees in no respect with their argument, and does not harmonize with their system, nor is suitable for a typical manifestation of the things in the Pleroma, [yet has a wide prevalence,] will be proved as follows from the Scriptures. 

Soter is a name of five letters; Pater, too, contains five letters;

Agape (love), too, consists of five letters; and our LORD, after blessing the five loaves, fed with them five thousand men. 

Five virgins were called wise by the LORD; and, in like manner, five were styled foolish. 

Again, five men are said to have been with the LORD when He obtained testimony from the FATHER, — namely, Peter, and James, and John, and Moses, and Elias. 

The LORD also, as the fifth person, entered into the apartment of the dead maiden, and raised her up again; for, says [the Scripture], “He suffered no man to go in, save Peter and James, and the father and mother of the maiden.” 

The rich man in Hell declared that he had five brothers, to whom he desired that one rising from the dead should go. 

The pool from which the LORD commanded the paralytic man to go into his house, had five porches. 

The very form of the cross, too, has five extremities, two in length, two in breadth, and one in the middle, on which [last] the person rests who is fixed by the nails. 

Each of our hands has five fingers; we have also five senses; our internal organs may also be reckoned as five, viz., the heart, the liver, the lungs, the spleen, and the kidneys. 

Moreover, even the whole person may be divided into this number [of parts], — the head, the breast, the belly, the thighs, and the feet. 

The human race passes through five ages first infancy, then boyhood, then youth, then maturity, and then old age. 

Moses delivered the law to the people in five books. Each table which he received from GOD contained five commandments. 

The veil covering the holy of holies had five pillars. 

The altar of burnt-offering also was five cubits in breadth. 

Five priests were chosen in the wilderness, — namely, Aaron, Nadab, Abiud, Eleazar, Ithamar. 

The ephod and the breastplate, and other sacerdotal vestments, were formed out of five materials; for they combined in themselves gold, and blue, and purple, and scarlet, and fine linen. 

And there were five kings of the Amorites, whom Joshua the son of Nun shut up in a cave, and directed the people to trample upon their heads. 

Any one, in fact, might collect many thousand other things of the same kind, both with respect to this number and any other he chose to fix upon, either from the Scriptures, or from the works of nature lying under his observation.

+  +  +

The folly of arguing that there IS NO "CROSS" upon which Y'SHUA+ the M'SHIKHA was crucified is apparent. 

Is it not folly to CHANGE a word in the Holy Writ ... without some linguistic authority to do so ?  

Yet, the Netzarim Publishing house's version of the New Covenant, translated by Mr. Andrew Roth , has done this very thing. 

Is it not folly  to  IGNORE the Early Church apologists who wrote about Pre-Nicene Christianity in the 100 to 200's AD ... and pretend we know better than these early followers of Y'SHU+ who obviously were taught by men who were taught of the Apostles and Evangelists and Disciples of Y'SHU+ ... firsthand ?  

Yet, the AENT published by the Netzarim Publishing House has done so. 

Is it not folly  to cast aside the wisdom of Justin Martyr, Ignatius, and Irenaeus .... and establish one's own doctrine which conflicts with these martyrs of Y'SHU+ ? 

Yet, the Netzarim's AENT has done so.


+  +  + 

In the coming months and years, fellow followers of Y'SHU+ the M'SHIKHA, we will 

ALL NEED TO ADHERE 

to sound doctrine and to each other, 

as the kingdom of the 10 Kings of Revelation 17:12   wreak havoc with us all... beheading us, driving us from our homes as the Syrians have been driven, marking us and our homes with the "N" for Nazarene , as has been done in Iraq.

Times are NOT going to become "better" but rather, worse as the time approaches of His+ 2nd Appearing. 

Be wise, be wise. Tolerate only the TRUTH+... for in HIM+ will be our only place of safety on planet earth.

Thousands have already paid the price .... just like the Early Christians did .... for following Y'SHU+.  Do not think for a moment that we will escape the wrath and demonized policies of the 10 kings, set to destroy the human race. Christians and Jews especially are targeted. 

Maranatha, LORD Y'SHU+, Maranatha. 

Saturday, December 13, 2014

CROSS in Pre-Nicene Writings .... a CROSS-beam Attached to a Pole



Photo courtesy of  Mustard Seed International
The Brazen Serpent Monument 
over-looking Mt. Nebo, Jordan



The Pre-Nicene Early Christian writers, Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 1: 
  • Justin Martyr (c. 110-165 AD,  of Samaria ) and 
  • Irenaeus ( C. 120 - 202 AD, approximated dates, of Syria; later made Bishop of Lyons, France ) 

both had much to say regarding the Crucifixion of Y'SHU the M'SHIKHA ( JESUS CHRIST ) in their apologies for The Way + ... the Way+ of the CROSS ... not the " stake."


CROSS photo by the Order of the GOOD SHEPHERD+ 
Yes, it is crucial to realize Our LORD died innocently as the Sacrificial LAMB+ of ALAHA to deliver us from sin, hell, and death, by whatever means HE+ and His+ Heavenly FATHER chose to use. 

It is also crucial to realize the CROSS was presented as a pattern and type throughout the Old Covenant .... 

so that... 

His+ IDENTIFICATION could be readily established for those awaiting the Messiah+, when the true M'SHIKHA+ became incarnate upon this earth. 

Scripture accounts tell us there were some false Messiahs who proclaimed themselves and they too were slain or taken captive. But, the false Messiahs did NOT fit the pattern of identification which was established in the Old Covenant.

Also pertinent to this discussion is the problematic use of STAKE instead of CROSS  found throughout the Netzarim Publishing House's Aramaic-English New Testament by Mr. Andrew Roth ... in spite of all linguistic and lexical authorities ! 

Herein is the CRUCIAL issue: By changing CROSS to "stake,"  Mr. Roth changes the stake to STAFF ~  and hence extrapolates that to a staff of authority !  

Matthew 10:38, AENT, verbatim ~ supposedly words of Y'SHU+ (JESUS, in English):  

"And anyone that does not take up his staff (107) and come and follow me is not worthy of me."  

Footnote 107 shows the AENT's purpose in changing CROSS to "stake" and "stake" to "staff."  It states: 

"Take up your staff and follow means to exercise your personal authority .  A staff is a symbol of authority that is used for mobility and protection ( see B'midbar / Numbers 17:1-10 or 17:16-25 in Jewish versions). Christian versions insert "cross" here which does not appear in either Aramaic or Greek texts. See Pole, the Standard , in Appendix. " [ Unfortunately for his readers, this statement is inaccurate in all points regarding the Aramaic and Greek texts.  SrJH.  + + +]

At this point, let me insert a note of interest. "NES"  is the transliterated Hebrew word for POLE , that pole upon which Moses was ordered to place the brazen serpent for the healing of the Hebrews bitten by poisonous serpents.  



In fact, this "NES" was not a sturdy up-right timber, like a modern telephone pole. Rather, it was a frame-work for a BANNER, the kind with a cross-pole affixed to an upright pole. The banner was NOT like a pennant flying at the top of a sports stadium, but rather a rectangular banner going before a group with its family crest or ensign upon it. See this pictured above of that "pole" at Mount Nebo, Jordan.  




So now, let us look at what Justin Martyr states in his writings about the PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION of the CROSS of Y'SHU+ the M'SHIKHA.  


Justin’s Dialogue with Trypho, 
pg. 214-215
Courtesy of www.biblestudytools.com

Chapter XL.-He Returns to the Mosaic Laws, and Proves that They Were Figures of the Things Which Pertain to Christ.
"The mystery, then, of the lamb which God enjoined to be sacrificed as the passover, was a type of Christ; with whose blood, in proportion to their faith in Him, they anoint their houses, i.e., themselves, who believe on Him. For that the creation which God created-to wit, Adam-was a house for the spirit which proceeded from God, you all can understand. And that this injunction was temporary, I prove thus.
 God does not permit the lamb of the passover to be sacrificed in any other place than where His name was named; knowing that the days will come, after the suffering of Christ, when even the place in Jerusalem shall be given over to your enemies, and all the offerings, in short, shall cease; and that lamb which was commanded to be wholly roasted was a symbol of the suffering of the cross which Christ would undergo.
 For the lamb,(108) which is roasted, is roasted and dressed up in the form of the cross. 
For one spit is transfixed right through from the lower parts up to the head, and one across the back, to which are attached the legs of the lamb.
And the two goats which were ordered to be offered during the fast, of which one was sent away as the scape [goat], and the other sacrificed, were similarly declarative of the two appearances of Christ: the first, in which the elders of your people, and the priests, having laid hands on Him and put Him to death, sent Him away as the scape [goat]; 
and His second appearance, because in the same place in Jerusalem you shall recognise Him whom you have dishonoured, and who was an offering for all sinners willing to repent, and keeping the fast which Isaiah speaks of, loosening the terms(109) of the violent contracts, and keeping the other precepts, likewise enumerated by him, and which I have quoted,(110) which those believing in Jesus do. And further, you are aware that the offering of the two goats, which were enjoined to be sacrificed at the fast, was not permitted to take place similarly anywhere else, but only in Jerusalem.

Justin’s Dialogue with Trypho, 
pg 244-235 
Courtesy of www.biblestudytools.com
Chapter XCI.-
The Cross Was Foretold in the Blessings of Joseph, 
and in the Serpent that Was Lifted Up.
"And God by Moses shows in another way the force of the mystery of the cross, when He said in the blessing wherewith Joseph was blessed,
 `From the blessing of the Lord is his land; for the seasons of heaven, and for the dews, and for the deep springs from beneath, and for the seasonable fruits of the sun,(356) and for the coming together of the months, and for the heights of the everlasting mountains, and for the heights of the hills, and for the ever-flowing rivers, and for the fruits of the fatness of the earth; and let the things accepted by Him who appeared in the bush come on the head and crown of Joseph.
 Let HIM+ be glorified among his brethren;(357) his beauty is [like] the firstling of a bullock; his horns the horns of an unicorn: with these shall he push the nations from one end of the earth to another.'(358)
 Now, no one could say or prove that the horns of an unicorn represent any other fact or figure than the type which portrays the cross.

 For the one beam is placed upright, from which the highest extremity is raised up into a horn, when the other beam is fitted on to it, and the ends appear on both sides as horns joined on to the one horn. 
And the part which is fixed in the centre, on which are suspended those who are crucified, also stands out like a horn; and it also looks like a horn conjoined and fixed with the other horns. [ Apparently, this is in reference to what the Eastern Orthodox and other churches term the "sedle" upon which a body rested during the death throes while hanging upon the cross. SrJH  + + +]
And the expression, `With these shall he push as with horns the nations from one end of the earth to another, 'is indicative of what is now the fact among all the nations. For some out of all the nations, through the power of this mystery, having been so pushed, that is, pricked in their hearts, have turned from vain idols and demons to serve God. But the same figure is revealed for the destruction and condemnation of the unbelievers; even as Amalek was defeated and Israel victorious when the people came out of Egypt, by means of the type of the stretching out of Moses' hands, and the name of Jesus (Joshua), by which the son of Nave (Nun) was called. 
And it seems that the type and sign, which was erected to counteract the serpents which bit Israel, was intended for the salvation of those who believe that death was declared to come thereafter on the serpent through Him that would be crucified, but salvation to those who had been bitten by him and had betaken themselves to Him that sent His Son into the world to be crucified.(359) For the Spirit of prophecy by Moses did not teach us to believe in the serpent, since it shows us that he was cursed by God from the beginning; and in Isaiah tells us that he shall be put to death as an enemy by the mighty sword, which is Christ.
FIRST APOLOGY OF JUSTIN pg. 174
Chapter XXXV.-Other Fulfilled Prophecies.
And how CHRIST after HE+ was born was to escape the notice of other men until HE+ grew to man's estate, which also came to pass, hear what was foretold regarding this.
There are the following predictions:(67) -"Unto us a child is born, and unto us a young man is given, and the government shall be upon His+ shoulders; "(68) which is significant of the power of the cross, for to it, when HE+ was crucified, HE+ applied His+ shoulders, as shall be more clearly made out in the ensuing discourse.


And again the same prophet Isaiah, being inspired by the prophetic Spirit, said, "I have spread out my hands to a disobedient and gainsaying people, to those who walk in a way that is not good. They now ask of me judgment, and dare to draw near to God."(69)
 And again in other words, through another prophet, He says, "They pierced My hands and My feet, and for My vesture they cast lots."(70
And indeed David, the king and prophet, who uttered these things, suffered none of them; but JESUS CHRIST stretched forth His+ hands, being crucified by the Jews speaking against Him+, and denying that HE+ was the CHRIST.
And as the prophet spoke, they tormented Him, and set Him on the judgment-seat, and said, Judge us. And the expression, "They pierced my hands and my feet," was used in reference to the nails of the cross which were fixed in His hands and feet.
And after He was crucified they cast lots upon His vesture, and they that crucified Him parted it among them. And that these things did happen, you can ascertain from the Acts of Pontius Pilate.(71) And we will cite the prophetic utterances of another prophet, Zephaniah,(72) to the effect that He was foretold expressly as to sit upon the foal of an ass and to enter Jerusalem. The words are these: "Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion; shout, O daughter of Jerusalem: behold, thy King cometh unto thee; lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal of an ass."(73)


Next Post:  
The CROSS words of Irenaeus 
from the Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 1. 

  







Friday, October 24, 2014

It Has NOT Been "I" Living in Me !

Original Drawing by Bro. Brendon Patrick, 1985

Order of The GOOD SHEPHERD+

Uniting one's will with 
Y'SHU+ the M'SHIKHA 

~ OR ~

HOW to UNFAILINGLY
KEEP TORAH

Galatians 2:20 
All verses courtesy of Dukhrana.com
Peshitta NT, British and Foreign Bible Society
Khabouris Peshitta verses are taken from the 
Khabouris Codex Transcription by Stephen P. Silver.



 - ܘܥܰܡ ܡܫܺܝܚܳܐ ܙܩܺܝܦ݂ ܐ݈ܢܳܐ ܘܡܶܟ݁ܺܝܠ ܠܳܐ ܗ݈ܘܳܐ ܐܶܢܳܐ ܚܰܝ ܐ݈ܢܳܐ ܐܶܠܳܐ ܚܰܝ ܒ݁ܺܝ ܡܫܺܝܚܳܐ ܘܗܳܢܳܐ ܕ݁ܗܳܫܳܐ ܚܰܝ ܐ݈ܢܳܐ ܒ݁ܰܒ݂ܣܰܪ ܒ݁ܗܰܝܡܳܢܽܘܬ݂ܳܐ ܗ݈ܘ ܕ݁ܰܒ݂ܪܶܗ ܕ݁ܰܐܠܳܗܳܐ ܚܰܝ ܐ݈ܢܳܐ ܗܰܘ ܕ݁ܰܐܚܒ݂ܰܢ ܘܝܰܗ݈ܒ݂ ܢܰܦ݂ܫܶܗ ܚܠܳܦ݂ܰܝܢ ܀ 
Galatians 2:20 - ܘܥܡ ܡܫܝܚܐ ܙܩܝܦ ܐܢܐ ܘܡܟܝܠ ܠܐ ܗܘܐ ܐܢܐ ܚܝ ܐܢܐ ܐܠܐ ܚܝ ܒܝ ܡܫܝܚܐ ܘܗܢܐ ܕܗܫܐ ܚܝ ܐܢܐ ܒܒܣܪ ܒܗܝܡܢܘܬܐ ܗܘ ܕܒܪܗ ܕܐܠܗܐ ܚܝ ܐܢܐ ܗܘ ܕܐܚܒܢ ܘܝܗܒ ܢܦܫܗ ܚܠܦܝܢ ܀


This marvelously wonderful and both simple-yet-complex verse  ... which has 6  " I 's " in it ...   holds the key to uniting one's will with  The M'SHIKHA !

 We will unlock the MYSTERY of how to keep Torah flawlessly by examining the grammar of Galatians 2:20.

But please note well:
 
Keeping as many as possible of the 613 laws commonly thought of as "Torah"  does have its function  ... as well as those things written in the Psalms and Prophets... in the Christian church.

It is written in Scripture that the Apostles were in the Temple at the appointed prayer times of the morning and evening sacrifices, after the Resurrection.  It would be fool-hardy to think that the Apostle Paul abandoned all the spiritual training he had as a Pharisee.

What made the difference to the Christian Apostles after the Resurrection was that keeping of Torah now was submitted to the ONE+ Who+ wrote it, lived it, and more... FULFILLED IT !  Y'SHU+ the M'SHIKHA now was alive after HE+ had been crucified ... and was living in their hearts! 

Those who are natural-minded and who are trying to know CHRIST (M'SHIKHA+ ) through keeping the Torah  are as lost as ever... 

if... if... if...
they have NOT entered into a personal relationship with Y'SHU+ the M'SHIKHA.   

The Old Covenant is finished; the New Covenant through M'SHIKHA+  must be entered into by repentance, a death to self, and baptism into His+ death. 

The discipline the Apostles embraced, then, was accomplished via their love for Y'SHU+. It naturally flowed into and out from them all as they lived TOTALLY for Y'SHU+ ( Y'SHUA+, Hebrew; JESUS, English).   

What they embraced is called "spiritual discipline," such as indicated by the Psalmist's words in Psalm 119:164 ~
"Seven times a day will I praise THEE." 
   
Discipline ... a submitting of one's body, mind, soul, and spirit to exercises of faith such as fasting, regular prayer times, Bible reading, corporate worship and individual worship... is a necessary part of a Christian's walk.  

A separation from the world and its ways and values and conduct, as well as dress and things of "entertainment," is part of that discipline also. 

The Christian church as a whole has neglected and negated DISCIPLINE as part of its structure. This is why various "Torah-keeping" groups hold an attraction for seekers: they want that structure of discipline.  

Most likely, the discipline embraced by some of the Orders in various church organizations is the ONLY THING that stands between that church organization... and total destruction. 

Thus, for those who follow Y'SHU+ ( JESUS, Y'SHUA+ ) 

... whether by a spiritual discipline of keeping Torah or a spiritual discipline of some sort placed upon one by the HOLY SPIRIT...  

discipline and discipleship are VERY IMPORTANT to the survival of the church, wherever it may be found.
/  Sr. J. H.  +++  
+  +  +

Dealing with the Grammar of GALATIANS 2:20  ~  ~  ~ 

versus the AENT, the Netzarim Publishing House's version of the New Covenant, edited and compiled by Mr. Andrew Roth with a committee of Netzarim proof-readers and professional editors.  

This Netzarim publishing house's Aramaic-English New Testament version of Galatians 2:20 is translated with the: 
  • omission of :  2 phrases, 1 word, plus 2 "ands"
  • addition of : 7 words
  • wrong verb tenses: 3 X
  • wrong verb "voice" : 1 X
  • wrong pronoun suffixes: 2X

PLUS... 4 wrong "concepts" embedded into that verse!



Hence, for scholars and readers and even any Netzarim who are interested in Truth of the Word, we will look at this verse carefully and thoroughly. Readers may also check the Khabouris, the second Aramaic verse printed above, to see if there is any variations between it and the Syriac Peshitta. ( There is not, in this verse, as one may plainly see.)  However, I use the Syriac Peshitta because the vowels are clearly marked and sometimes, the vowel pointings DO make a difference in the translation. 


1.   ܘܥܰܡ  This word is really two words = "and-with"
In the AENT= "And" is separated from "with" ( ?) and translated with the coming verb. 
2 .   ܡܫܺܝܚܳܐ  = M'SHIKHA+ , M,Sg, Emphatic = The Messiah
3.  ܙܩܺܝܦ݂  = crucify: 1st,M,Sg = "I", passive PARTICIPLE, peal = have been crucified   or  some translators say, am crucified.    
4.  ܐ݈ܢܳܐ = " I " ; Now here is a vital element of grammar and an example of the necessity of using vowel points for a new Aramaic/ Syriac language reader. 
Notice this part:  ܐ݈ = Under the aleph letter, there is a slight diagonal line, almost a slash. It tells the reader that letter is SILENT. The next letter, a nun, ܢܳܐ has a vowel point above it that says / " ah " /.  So to enunciate this  " I "  =  one must simply say / " 'na " /.  

This ܐ݈ܢܳܐ = is used with verb PARTICIPLES ! It does not stand alone as a pronoun in an Aramaic/ Syriac sentence. 

If / " 'na "/ does not have a PARTICIPLE with it, it will have the stand-alone form  of " I " =   ܐܶܢܳܐ with it, 

" ena 'na

and it will carry  the meaning of : It is I or I am.   

Native readers of Syriac would KNOW than 'na would always be used with a participle verb form and thus, not need to have the vowel pointings to direct them. 

In the AENT: 

The phrase: "I have been crucified"  has been mis-construed in a number of ways. First of all, Mr. Roth states it like this:  
" And I am executed on a stake"  

The verb voice is passive, participle , peal. Some translators have said:  "I am crucified" instead of "have been crucified." 

However that may be, there is no such word, EXECUTE in the several lexicons included in Dukhrana, including the Comprehensive Aramaic Lexicon ( CAL ) out of Hebrew Union College in Cincinnati for the word

   ܙܩܺܝܦ݂ = ZQi Y P. 

There is, however, a couple of words found at www.assyrianlanguages.org, through LexiLogos / Syriac Dictionary, which include EXECUTE in their definitions. 

This website lists, for EXECUTE : 

  • CH N Q, a verb form found in Matthew 13:7 = to hang / to execute on a gallows.  In Mt. 13:7, it means to choke. At a glance, once can see that is NOT the verb used in Galatians 2:20. 
  • Another verb used to mean EXECUTE is M-M-T = the causative of M-Aleph-T. 
  • Another verb listed is Q-t-Y-L-V-T-Aleph = killing, slaying, executed. 
None of these words even remotely resemble ZQi Y P.   which Mr. Roth translates as EXECUTE, as even a non-reader of Aramaic / Syriac can clearly see.


"  And I am executed on a stake"

In the AENT, the words on a stake   have simply been inserted; there is NO TEXT in the Peshitta or Khabouris which supports that phrase! 

In other words, the Aramaic or Syriac words are NOT THERE ... from which Mr. Roth is supposed to be translating !

A quick search through Dukhrana reveals NO words in the Syriac New Covenant for either POLE or STAKE.

A search on LexiLogos at www.assyrianlanguages.org does have a word somewhat related to this search. 

It is S-P-D-Ch and it means "to impale, to pierce." 

However, this word is found in the Urmiah dialect, in Iran, not the Syrian dialect! 

Thus, we see the AENT has inserted a phrase here and mis-translated the word, CRUCIFIED, and supplanted it with an EXECUTED.  Even worse, the AENT has mis-construed the entire concept of Our LORD dying on a cross and have HIM+ instead being executed on a stake, impaled or not .


What is the basis 
for this mis-construction 
of a basic Christian concept ?   

More to come regarding the odd translation of the AENT in the following posts on Galatians 2:20 !